You don't need a full-time planner — or years reading schedules — to know whether a programme holds up. Upload a P6, Asta or Excel file and get the scrutiny a senior planner would give it, in seconds.
Assessed against the DCMA 14-point standard and the UK's CIOB Planning Protocol 2021 — how we check →
Assessed against both the DCMA 14-point standard and the UK's CIOB PP21 — scored to a single A–F grade and a PP21 compliance verdict. Know whether a programme is defensible before you rely on it.
Fourteen checks the 14-point pass walks past — detached and dangling logic, redundant links, out-of-sequence progress, oversized lags, ALAP overuse. The faults that quietly break a network.
Compare two revisions: what slipped, what was compressed, where float went, and the impact on the critical path — even when the end date holds.
Behind programme? Model crashing, fast-tracking, and combined recovery on a live critical-path engine — with the time saved, cost, and risk of each.
An AI forensic-planner read on top of the numbers: activities light on detail, logic that can't be built, durations compressed without method. The qualitative call the automation can't make.
Every check and finding points to the exact activities behind it — an evidence trail you can put in front of a contractor or client, not just a score.
Drag in a .xer, .xml or .xlsx. Nothing to install.
Scored against DCMA 14-point, CIOB PP21 and our critical-path engine.
A clear, evidenced report, emailed to you and ready to hand to a client.
Real examples of the faults, drift, and hidden risk this catches on live construction programmes — and why each one matters.
Browse example findings →